

Most read
- Apple ‘Swift Introduction’ workshop to be offered
- Attorney General Morrisey Finalizes $300K Settlement with Fiat Chrysler
- Wayne High School Wins Against Tolsia
- Tri State Cheerleading Competition
- Former W.Va. Judge Gets Prison Time for Corruption
- Opera Workshop to present ‘Little Red Riding Hood’ at Cox Landing Elementary
- Secretary of State rep. accused of electioneering for county clerk
- School of Music to host Chamber Choir Invitational
Wolfe States He Should Have Conferred with All Council Members Before the Emergency Purchase of One Salt Spreader

Council will have an opportunity to override the veto at its, Monday February 14 meeting. The ordinance to reduce the limit passed 6-5. Council members Rebecca Thacker, Russ Houck, Jim Insco and Teresa Loudermilk joined Ritter and Caserta in voting for the reduction.
At the time, Steve Williams, finance committee chairman, sought a compromise in which the spending limit would remain $15,000, but council would be informed in a timely manner of purchases exceeding $7,500.
At the meeting, Ritter said, Stating the Finance Committee had “muddied the waters,” sponsor Jim Ritter cautioned that “people watch what we do.” He then repeated that “council had been worried about this fiscal year,” which recalled the numerous limitations placed on the city’s operations in anticipation of a revenue short-fall due to the recession. “This body has responsibility for the budget,” Ritter stressed.
Councilman Scott Caserta supported Ritter adding, “We’re just not willing to loosen the reins as we were last year.” He prefaced that statement with a comment that “the majority of council” does not “right now have confidence” in the Administration concerning the higher limit.
On the other hand, Police Chief Skip Holbrook and Fire Chief Craig Moore spoke against the more restrictive spending ordinance explaining it would hinder departmental operations of day to day purchases.
This is the Mayor’s first veto since taking office.
He said in another interview that the spending freeze may have been a reaction to his decision to purchase one salt spreader on an emergency purchase after council turned down buying two of them. One was about $11,000.
Wolfe , in hindsight, stated instead of consulting two or three council member on the purchase of one spreader, he should have informed the full council. Thus, the spending reduction , perhaps, undeservedly became an exercise of council’s displeasure over the decision to buy one salt spreader.