- ANALYSIS: Huntington Pilot Plant Oak Ridge-DOE Documents May Provide New Hope for Workers Denied Cold Standby Compensation
- MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX: Defense Dept. Contracts for Apr. 22, 2014
- More than 100,000 Had Symptoms During Elk River Water Spill
- Huntington Man Pleads Guilty to Intent to Distribute Heroin, Cocaine, Oxycodone
- Brockovich Protesting at US Supreme Court; Case Involves Water Contamination
- Huntington Man Sentenced for Bar Shooting
- Sixteen individuals, Mid-Ohio Valley Club to be honored at awards banquet
- BOOK REVIEW: 'The Opposite of Loneliness': Marina Keegan's Posthumous Collection of Essays, Stories
- SCENES from April 2014 Art Walk
- City to unveil new small business initiative during news conference
EDITORIAL: Manchin's Loss of Pro-Life Endorsement a Significant Setback
West Virginians for Life has emerged over several years as a potent political force in West Virginia with thousands of friends in both parties. Their efforts to raise the consciousness of the public and public officials here on life issues ranging from abortion and infanticide to euthanasia and eldercare has been commendable.
Moreover, in officers like Dr. Wanda Franz, Karen Cross, and Mary Anne Buchanan, West Virginians for Life has contributed their knowledge and expertise at the National Right to Life Committee's efforts, as well.
This year, West Virginians for Life faced a unique situation, but they handled it in a way that befits a self-respecting organizations of its size and strength. They stood true to their convictions and ignored political gamesmanship by the current junior U.S. Senator, Joe Manchin, who tried to paste over his differences with West Virginians for Life with a particularly weak effort.
After voting for continued Planned Parenthood funding with taxpayer dollars--incredibly, over $300 million in a tight budget year--Manchin tried his famous charm with West Virginians for Life in the form of throwing out a "transparency" provision to go along with the Planned Parenthood bill. But at the time of the vote, West Virginians for Life rightly called such a gesture meaningless.
"The bill that Sen. Manchin wants to put forth really is irrelevant," said West Virginains for Life Communications Director Mary Anne Buchanan. "It's just a cover. We really feel that he doesn't want to defund Planned Parenthood. He just puts this up as his means of saying, "I want to do something to take care of this problem when really it's not going to help at all."
West Virginians for Life members across the state have endured a double shot to the gut from Joe Manchin in his first year in office. First, he voted for Obamacare in the revote shortly after he was sworn in back in early 2011. Manchin had promised during the 2010 campaign that he would vote against Obamacare, not for it, if it came up again. Up it came, and down he went--voting to support President Obama's controversial health care plan.
The Obamacare plan remains controversial for its enormous cost as the largest entitlement program in American history--and for providing abortions at taxpayer expense, a tripwire not only for pro-lifers but advocates for taxpayers.
If that wasn't enough to wonder if Manchin was surrendering his own pro-life credentials, his vote to sustain hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars for Planned Parenthood confirmed that he was changing sides. Get this: Planned Parenthood is the largest provider of abortions in America. How could Joe Manchin support underwriting one-third of Planned Parenthood's yearly budget with taxpayer dollars and expect the support of most West Virginians in both major parties?
West Virginians for Life could not and would not surrender their hard-fought positions in defense of the defenseless. So they rewarded two consistent pro-life champions for the U.S. Senate this year: Fletcher in the Democratic Primary and John Raese in the Republican Primary.
Democrats who are weary of Manchin's flip-flopping on everything from social issues to Cap and Trade can send a powerful signal to Manchin this May. They have a genuine choice offered by Sheirl Fletcher, a consistently pro-life, pro-business, pro-coal Democrat. Manchin may need to realize that he doesn't have a monopoly on those issues--and he has lost his credentials on the pro-life front altogether.
That spells trouble for Manchin. He may still win the Democratic Primary, but you never know. Sheirl Fletcher hasn't gone out of her way to offend huge organizations like West Virginians for Life, and she is sufficiently conservative on the other important issues to give Manchin a real run now. Certainly, the West Virginians for Life endorsement has given Fletcher added credibility statewide.