- Sheetz Development Narrowly Passes Planning Commission
- $2.09 Per Gallon Gas Called Sign Mechanical Problem
- Antitrust agreement will protect our citizens’ best interests
- Huntington Audit Recommendations Spur City Council Disagreement
- Super Heroes and Royalty Attract Throngs to Block Party IMAGES
- 70 Years of Atomic Bombs: Can We Disarm Yet?
- Senate President Cole, Speaker of the House Armstead Pledge to Defend West Virginia's Coal Mining Industry
- PARALLEL UNIVERSE: Lincoln Electric Celebrates 81 Uninterrupted Years of Paying Employee Profit-Sharing Bonus
- Complaint alleges Stockert-Sizemore Funeral Home violated the West Virginia Preneed Act and state Consumer Credit and Protection Act.
- University to partner on $20 million scientific research grant
Spielberg's "Lincoln" Induces Suspense, Simple Insight into Complex Legalities
Situated during the scavenging last days of the Civil War --- January 1865 and the surrender April 9 --- the President passionately moves heaven and hell to legislatively legitimize his war powers backed action of the Emancipation Proclamation. Screenwriter Tony (“Angels in America,” “Munich”) Kushner melds that which would have been branded automatically BORING into crisp, hard edged, suspenseful drama, which cumulates into similar emotions as the rousing hand clap wrap of a good dude trumping the dark side adventure.
Day-Lewis enthralls and entertains as an often awkwardly comfortable commander in chief who’d rather be espousing symbolic stories to avid listeners. Less than iron but obviously not putty, the accomplished actor swaggers from accomplished legalistic oratory to the vulnerability of a simple husband/wife disagreement escalating into wrenching family choices, conflicts and consequences ironically exacerbated by Lincoln’s multiple obligations.
Prone to small town lawyer adversarial analysis, Day-Lewis magnifies best endless legal rubrics of his slave freedom decision by argumentatively advocating both sides of the judicial fence concerning the propriety of emancipation war powers balanced by narrower constitutional restrictions.
Aside from a few horrific reminders of bludgeoned foot soldiers, “Lincoln” slips into dark, smoky hidden negotiations and strategies that accompany high stakes political lobbying. Kushner’s gift for juggling and unraveling the most convoluted into simplicity allows an insider’s look see of federal government at a time mostly free of multiple gatekeepers, blackberries, and other daunting multi-layered insolation.
Avoiding institutional gridlock political buzz phrases, the 1865 hand shaking, arm twisting, favor laden power and ego stroking easily imparts application of fiscal cliffs, Mid Eastern chaos, non-compromise, activist judges, and another inch along a spectrum toward equality for all. It inevitably taints the absolutely pure “honest” Abe fable for one stained by political realities, then and now.