- Morehead Clerk Faces Contempt Hearing in Ashland
- For "The Interview" Will Small Screen Lose Wonder and Suspension of Disbelief?
- Discover some of West Virginia’s state park lodges in January 2015 with a “WV50” $50 room rate
- BOOK REVIEW: 'Suspicion': Delightfully Scary Novel Aimed at Young Women Hits Its Target Like an Arrow from Robin Hood
- OP ED COLUMN: Tax Reform Committee Is Covering All Ground
- CFPB Sues Sprint for Cramming Consumers with Unauthorized Third-Party Charges; Sprint Ignored Complaints from Consumers and Cost Them Tens of Millions of Dollars
- Pre Christmas Live Theatricals
- Census Bureau Estimates Show How School-Age Child Poverty in Every County Compares with Prerecession Levels
- "My Brother, My Brother & Me" Sunday Night at City Hall Auditorium
- CFPB Report Finds Continued Decline in College Credit Card Agreements; Most Colleges with Credit Card Agreements Do Not Make Them Easily Accessible to Students
APPALACHIAN POWER, WHEELING POWER FILE FUEL COSTS WITH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION; NO RATE CHANGE REQUESTED
The company is requesting no rate change for the second year in a row. In its filing, Appalachian proposed considering the costs for several cases together in order to keep rates stable for customers:
- Fuel and construction costs, which are included in the annual ENEC filing;
· Consumer Rate Relief Charge payments; and
· Costs associated with the transfer of certain generating assets and the merger of Appalachian and Wheeling Power.
The net effect of all these costs is that customer rates will stay the same. If the PSC rules in favor of Appalachian’s proposal for the ENEC, rates are not expected to change in 2013 and into 2014. Rates have not changed since mid-2011.
In 2012, Appalachian filed with the PSC requesting approval to issue Consumer Rate Relief Bonds designed to pay the under-recovered balance of past costs. Without the bonds, rates could have risen as much as 30 percent to pay for the coal costs, which stem from 2008 and 2009 when coal costs increased substantially. The parties to the case recently agreed to a settlement that will allow the company to finance $376 million in unrecovered cost. The settlement is currently pending before the PSC.
In another case currently before the Commission, Appalachian Power is proposing to acquire from Ohio Power 50 percent of Mitchell Plant and the remaining two-thirds of one unit at Amos Plant. This generation is needed because the company doesn’t own enough generation to meet the capacity and energy obligation to serve its customers. Appalachian has purchased power from these plants for many years to meet customer demand for electricity. The cost of purchasing power is roughly the same as the annual cost of purchasing the plants. In effect, this transfer allows the company to move from being a renter to an owner for little or no change in customer rates.
In another filing today, the company requested approval to continue its current energy efficiency programs and add two new short-term programs. After the first full year of the program in 2012, the company reached 101 percent of its annual energy savings goal. A total of 51.2 million kilowatt hours of energy savings was achieved, an amount equal to the annual usage of 4,350 average homes.
This savings goal was reached at a cost that was approximately $1 million below budget. The company proposes to use that $1 million for two new year-long programs. The first would provide targeted low-income weatherization assistance, and the second would provide rebates to commercial and industrial customers for custom energy efficiency programs.
Appalachian’s 9.7 cents per kilowatt-hour is still below the national average residential price for electricity of 11.5 cents/kwh. Tips for saving energy can be found on Appalachian’s website, www.AppalachianPower.com.