- BOOK NOTES: 'Burn the Fat, Feed the Muscle: Transform Your Body Forever Using the Secrets of the Leanest People in the World' Revised Edition
- Day One: NASCAR Champion’s Week In Las Vegas Officially Begins
- MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX: Defense Dept. Contracts for Dec. 3, 2013
- Additive Manufacturing Class at RCBI offers Overview of 3D Printing
- MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX: Defense Dept. Contracts for Dec. 4, 2013
- Students Fueling Success of Cabell County Schools Farm to School Effort
- Rice to Host Marshall in 2013 Football Championship Game
- CIVIL WAR OP-ED: 74th Anniversary of ‘Gone with the Wind’ Premiere
- Huntington City Council Agenda
- NASCAR: Jimmie Johnson Celebrates Sixth Title With Eye On A Seventh
OP-ED: What Is the No-Strike Euphoria All About?
Reality: there has been no collateral planning for such an effort. No one really knows where all of the chemical stuff might be hidden or being hustled out of the country by Hizbollah. What there is is a public relations sounding explosion taken up by the Russians with a kind of “Wow, what an idea, guys! Why didn’t somebody think of that sooner?”
Think of what?
If this rolling new idea keeps going, there may well be no strike that the administration has blown not only tens of millions of dollars running around the world declaring it has to happen or else and throwing its shaky credibility out for all to see, what is that world to think? And then, if we are to believe all t his investment can turn on an off the cuff remark by our Secretary of State who declared the idea an impossibility from the outset, what is going on in the minds of supposedly smart people?
If in fact, this new promotion does get President Assad to give the heave-ho to his chemical warfare stock AND we can prove he will do it under strict supervision, President Obama long ago declared we would NOT shoot for regime change, and so strike or no strike, chemical stuff or no such stuff, it’s back to the bloody rebellion in the streets of Damascus and elsewhere that has sent tens of thousands of Syrians to their death and many more out of the country as refugees.
So let’s put all that no-strike euphoria in perspective. The winner will not be the people of Syria or the political standing of our own President. The winner and still power boss will be Assad! He never had to worry about our sending in troops to kick him out because we said, as a matter of declared policy we would not do it, period.
So what do we tell those folks out in the streets who thought we might strike a blow to get the regime’s attention and that we meant what we broadcast around the world for weeks as an utter imperative?
I certainly did not support this thing that has been trumpeted called a “Strike” simply because nobody was willing to tell the American people or the world what the plan might be the morning after or what specifically we figured could be achieved besides more explosions in the hope we would not any innocent people. Besides, what I call our Intrusion Efficiency Index has not been very good.
Even assuming Assad buys into this tossed together idea with virtually no strategy, plan or other necessary ingredients, no doubt he will hoist whatever it is he drinks to celebrate.
There are those who see this action as a means to give peace a chance. Given our policy to avoid kicking the Syrian boss out, there is no peace to offer.* * *
Joseph J. Honick is a Bainbridge Island, WA-based international consultant to business and government and writes for many publications, including www.huntingtonnews.net. Honick can be reached at email@example.com.