- Delegate Mike Folk stands up for 2nd Amendment Rights in West Virginia
- Human Relations Commission Amendment Deletes “Handicap” Substitutes “Disabled”
- Marshall Has 21 Named to All-Conference and All-Freshman Teams
- Comprehensive Plan, Skatepark Approved by Huntington Council
- Contaminated Debris of Huntington Pilot Plant Transported by Truck in 1979
- IMAGES: Huntington High School Honored by Council, Mayor Despite Loss
- Toxic TCE Released to Huntington's Air Sept. 11-15, 2008, per EPA Settlement; Authorities not Immediately Notified of Release
- Prepared Remarks of Richard Cordray of CFPB on CareCredit Enforcement Action
- WSJ Wasteland Series Continues in Pennsylvania where Uranium Processing Site had "Birdcages"
- FLASHBACK: Major Huntington Landfill Contaminants Could Relate to Solvents or to Cold War Activities at Uranium Processing Plant
Rahall Wants Flood Insurance Rates Frozen
However, the law took effect while Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), which are used to determine flood insurance rates, are in the process of being updated nationwide. Rahall’s bill, HR 3380 would freeze the insurance hikes until the updated maps are finalized and would reimburse homeowners that are paying higher premiums in the interim.
“It’s not just rising waters that homeowners in flood prone areas now have to worry about, but dramatically rising flood insurance rates that are depressing home values and potentially forcing residents from the communities they lived in for generations,” Rahall said. “If being socked with skyrocketing premiums wasn’t bad enough, the maps that FEMA is relying on to justify these rate increases have not even been finalized. In some instances the new maps don’t even reflect federally funded flood projects that would take certain communities out of flood prone zones. My bill would suspend the new rate changes until these maps have been appropriately updated and would reimburse those that are now paying these unfair higher premiums.”
Since 1962, the National Flood Insurance Program has helped homeowners purchase affordable flood insurance. Changes to the Program designed to relieve its $24 billion deficit, mandated by the Biggert-Waters, have unexpectedly resulted in higher premiums for millions of homeowners across the country. Concerns have also been raised that as new flood maps are being draw across the country, they have neglected to include flood control efforts that would result in lower flood risk designations for certain communities. As such, Rahall’s legislation would also require the Army Corps of Engineers to certify that these maps include all flood control and mitigation projects before insurance rates could change.
According to Rahall: “These drastic premium increases were not intended by Congress and as such homeowners should not be forced to pay them. My bill would put the brakes on these hikes, make flood insurance participants whole, and gives Congress an opportunity to find a reasonable solution that shores-up the flood insurance program without increasing premiums to unreasonably high levels.”