- DuPont withholds crucial information regarding the proposed sale of Washington Works plant
- Ginseng Harvest Returns as "Appalachian Outlaws"
- McConaughey Tweets "Long Way from 1971..."
- 100 Layoffs at Special Metals
- SHELLY'S WORLD: The One That Got Away
- Op-ed: Essay on hope, Israel, Palestine, Bereaved Parents Circle
- UPDATING ... How Close will 'It Follows' be to 'Get Hard?'
- CARIBBEAN VIEW: Celebrate the CCJ--and Empower It
- Heroin Claims Another Huntington Life
- Huntington Celebrates Lifetimes of Making Magic
Hazardous Chemical Inventories Often Kept from Public
Following the reported Charleston spill, county and state agencies have stated they lacked emergency preparedness for such an incident.
But a May 2013 Reuters/ Chicago Tribune report indicated that reports are considered "tip sheets" for potential terrorists. Ten states would not disclosed inventories at the time of the article, causing Reuters to conclude compliance with the federal law to be "spotty." Forty states had not responded after 45 days.
"The U.S. hazardous-chemical reporting program, known as Tier II, is meant to alert residents to dangers in their communities and to inform planning that could prevent fatalities and injuries. The program grew out of the Emergency Planning and Community Right To Know Act, enacted in 1986, following leaks of dangerous chemicals in India and West Virginia," the article stated.
Mark Howard, director of the Arizona Emergency Management Commission, said releasing the data would compound the difficult problem of securing chemical sites.
"Stuff goes missing all the time," Howard said. "I honestly believe this has the potential to create more harm than the public knowing."
State government officials have access to the statewide inventory, he said, and are better suited to make decisions about chemical threats. "At some point, you have to hope the government is doing the right thing," he said.
You can access the full report here: