- Nuclear Accident in Illinois; Guards say Shelter in Place; Honeywell it all Stayed on Site
- OP-ED: Break-ups, Rejections and School Shootings: Educate Youth for Resiliency
- Reports Differ on Injuries at Metropolis Nuclear Plant Following Leakage of Uranium Hexafluoride
- MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX: Defense Dept. Contracts for Oct. 29, 2014
- Conspiracy Alleged in Energy Worker Exposure at Hanford, Portsmouth
- Over the Highway and to the Trench Contaminated Huntington Materials Exposed Many
- A License to Steal, Kill, Cover Up and Do it All Over Again
- New Gaming Arcade Business Opening in Downtown Huntington
- MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX: Defense Dept. Contracts for Oct. 28, 2014
- CARIBBEAN VIEW: Not only cricket but West Indian self-worth at stake
Radiation Amount and Job Category Exposures at former Huntington Atomic Energy Facility and others Claimed Deficient
The determinations relate to calculations used for the Energy Employee Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act (EEOICPA). The October 2000 legislation provides "long-denied justice to Department of Energy’s (DOE) nuclear weapons workers who had contracted occupational diseases through their exposure to the thousands of radioactive and other hazardous materials," according to the April 2014 DIAB Review (DEEOIC Interim Advisory Board of Citizen Volunteers Providing Transparency and Accountability for EEOICPA Claimants , DIABoard.org ).
A Department of Labor (DOL) database establishes contaminants to which former workers could likely have been exposed.
Terrie Barrie, founding member Alliance for Nuclear Worker Advocacy Groups , stated: "The report found serious deficiencies between "Process" listings in SEM (site exposure matrix) and the corresponding "Labor Categories" for 20 sites. Huntington Pilot Plant was one of the 20 sites," Barrie said. She explained, "For instance, 70% of the sites where "painting" was listed as a process did not have "painter" listed in the job category."
As a result, exposure calculations for jobs and processes, such as welding, painting, housekeeping, and administrative duties, are missing or non existent in a sample of 20 facilities. For instance, the exposure matrix lists a grounds keeping job but does not explain what toxins the worker would have been exposed. The "Comparison Between Site Processes and Labor Categories" does not link job categories with buildings, labor categories with toxic substances, and toxic substances with health effects.
The Department of Labor’s Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation (DEEOIC) has the responsibility for approval of employee claims. Due to deficiencies, they contracted with the National Academies of Sciences’ Institute of Medicine (IOM) ; however legislation has stalled. The interim board (DIAB) is comprised of volunteers from the advocate community, including former nuclear weapons workers, sick worker family members, and members from various professions who are familiar with the EEOICPA program.
For 39 sites which do not have a site exposure matrix, some of them operating in the last 20 years, yet so much "information has been lost" that an applicant is either denied or delayed. DEEOIC training material indicate that few claims have been made at these venues. However, 700 people have filed claims at seven of the 39 sites.
For PDF click attachment.
- 2014-4-3_DIAB_ SEM_process_labor.pdf (456.36 KB)