- This week’s Business Summit to feature Marshall alumnus, Intuit President and CEO Brad Smith
- For "The Interview" Will Small Screen Lose Wonder and Suspension of Disbelief?
- CFPB Sues Sprint for Cramming Consumers with Unauthorized Third-Party Charges; Sprint Ignored Complaints from Consumers and Cost Them Tens of Millions of Dollars
- Morehead Clerk Faces Contempt Hearing in Ashland
- Census Bureau Estimates Show How School-Age Child Poverty in Every County Compares with Prerecession Levels
- Pre Christmas Live Theatricals
- BOOK REVIEW: 'Suspicion': Delightfully Scary Novel Aimed at Young Women Hits Its Target Like an Arrow from Robin Hood
- Huntington Water Main Break Disrupts Service; Boil Advisory Added
- Discover some of West Virginia’s state park lodges in January 2015 with a “WV50” $50 room rate
- CFPB Report Finds Continued Decline in College Credit Card Agreements; Most Colleges with Credit Card Agreements Do Not Make Them Easily Accessible to Students
WV Supreme Court Upholds $37 Million Against Nursing Home Corporation Cites Manor Care’s Attempt to Conceal Inadequate Staffing
A complex web of corporations including Manor Care Inc. and HCR Manor Care Services, Inc. owns the home known as Heartland of Charleston. Heartland was found to have not only consistently understaffed the facility – which lead directly to Douglas’ death – but to have concealed it from state regulators. In a sharply worded opinion, the court scolded the defendants for its reckless behavior:
“Instead of properly addressing the chronic understaffing of Heartland Nursing Home, (Manor Care) Companies attempted to conceal (it) by creating the appearance of adequate staff during times when the facility was being inspected, and by allowing its posted staffing data to incorrectly reflect higher levels of staff than were actually working," Chief Justice Robin Davis wrote for the majority. "Specifically demonstrated by the facts of this case, (Manor Care) Companies’ conduct inflicted egregious physical harm upon a weak and helpless woman who depended upon them for her care: egregious physical harm that ultimately cost this helpless woman her life."
The McHugh Fuller Law Group brought the case on behalf of Ms. Douglas’ children. Speaking for the firm and on behalf of the family, attorney Mike Fuller said, “The family deeply appreciates the court’s time and effort allocated to this case. The family only wanted those responsible for their mother’s death held fully accountable for their actions.” Fuller added, “The court demonstrated that those who act recklessly and intentionally harm elderly residents will not escape justice in West Virginia. We are pleased they agreed that the Defendants’ conduct was reprehensible and deserved to be punished.”
Tom Douglas said, ”while the result in my mother’s case isn’t going to change what our family has endured, hopefully it will prevent another family from having to live through the same nightmare we did.”
The firm also issued the following statement:
“This verdict is not about the money, it is about holding this multibillion dollar corporation accountable for killing the people of this state. This not the first time that a West Virginia jury has said
that Manor Care’s reckless behavior has led to the unnecessary death of an elderly resident in its care. On behalf of the Douglas family, we at McHugh Fuller hope it is the last.
With this decision, the Court has shown great thought and fairness in protecting the citizens of this state, and that no matter how big the corporation, you cannot come in to West Virginia and
intentionally abuse and neglect our people and expect to get away with it.”
The Court posted its final ruling late Wednesday, June 18.