Auy. 15, 2006
COMMENTARY: The Secret to Ending the Male/Female Wage Gap
By Bonnie Erbe
Scripps Howard News Service
We now know the secret to closing the gap between men's and women's wages:
promote more women to upper-level management. The Washington Post reports:
"American women earn substantially more money and narrow the long-standing
gender gap in income if other women in their workplaces reach the ranks of
senior management." This finding was released at the annual meeting of the
American Sociological Association (ASA) and based on a review of 2000 Census
data of 1.3 million American workers in nearly 30,000 jobs and 79
metropolitan areas.
Conservative women have long argued there is no wage gap. Liberal women
insist there is, but find it to be a mite larger than the one revealed by
sociologists. Conservatives say that among young women and men with equal
educational credentials, women earn 98 cents for every dollar earned by men.
They add that women's lifestyle choices (staying home to raise children,
taking family leave time and/or working fewer hours) -- not prejudice --
dictate lower earnings. Liberals insist gender bias is still alive and well
in the American workplace.
Somewhere in between, sociologists have found a more believable theory: that
upper-level male managers tend to pay their male employees better than
female employees, and now, for the first time, we find women do the same
thing.
"Surprisingly, men who work for women managers seem to do slightly worse in
income than men who work for men, irrespective of whether the women managers
are in senior position(s)," the Post noted.
So what this means is that, for the most part, old-style, glaringly obvious
gender bias is as passe as high-fat food. But managers of either gender will
tend to favor their own in handing out bonuses and raises. In other words,
managers tend to surround themselves with employees who are like themselves
and reward those employees accordingly.
I recall covering the Supreme Court when the late Chief Justice William
Rehnquist was still in charge. I watched once as he read from the bench his
majority opinion in a school-busing case. The ruling dismantled school
busing for the purpose of achieving racial balance in public schools. The
opinion's gist was that busing, a creation of the courts, was a necessity in
an era when "de jure" or legal segregation had just ended.
But what was keeping schools largely segregated by race some four decades
later was something else: the voluntary decisions of people to buy or rent
housing in neighborhoods filled with other people of similar racial
backgrounds. Since school assignments were based on residential boundaries,
he reasoned, many public schools reflected the racial homogeny people choose
when they choose to live near others of the same race.
With voluntary housing choices, not illegal school segregation, creating
schools that were 80 percent or 90 percent white or black, the chief
announced, it no longer fell to the courts to impose busing to desegregate
schools. And nary a word of protest emanated from civil-rights groups.
Just as the races congregate in neighborhoods, so do the genders at work.
The ASA found: "Men work in jobs that are 70 percent male on average; women
work in jobs that are 70 percent female on average. Jobs with similar
educational requirements can pay very differently: Truck drivers earn far
more than nurse's aides, for example, and corporate lawyers earn more than
family lawyers."
I'm not advocating for comparable worth, a much-maligned concept in which
economists try to even out the pay gap between nurse's aides and truck
drivers (or other male- and female-dominated fields). But certainly a
similarly situated and credentialed woman should make the same salary as her
male counterpart in the same job.
But perhaps we've entered an era when society will sit back and accept that
gender (and, by inference, race) bias is permissible, when it is based on
"choice" rather than on prejudice. I hope not. I hope the restless demand
for equality is still a motivating force in American society -- one that may
be latent at the moment, but still there.
Bonnie Erbe is a TV host and writes this column for Scripps Howard News
Service. E-mail bonnieerbe@CompuServe.com







