
Most read
- 801 BAM Celebrates Art, Discusses Downtown Development IMAGES
- Costumes and Comic Books Bring Out the Tricon Nerds IMAGES
- UP CLOSE: Preparing to "Jump" and Taking the "Plunge" on Bridge Day Images
- Fire Prevention Parade IMAGES
- Friday Tsubasacon 2016 IMAGES Cosplay
- Jabberwowcky Kicks off DAWG's Pullman Thursday Series
- East Carolina Stuns Marshall with 82-81 Win at Cam Henderson Center
- FLASHBACK IMAGE COLLECTION: The Making of We Are Marshall In Huntington
OPINION: Sammy Cartagena - How Agriculture Bureaucrats Are Manipulating Food Prices—and Our Diets
One method government has historically used for easing the perception of inflation is to push for the consumption of low-cost goods through government recommendations and subsidies. This strategy has been used especially frequently in the agriculture industry, since food comprises a major variable expense in people’s everyday budgets. In the 1970s, during a period of high inflation, Secretary of Agriculture Earl Butz pushed for policies that would encourage the mass production of low-cost monocrops such as corn and soy. He famously told farmers to “get big or get out” and urged farmers to plant commodity crops “from fencerow to fencerow.”
Getting consumers to substitute lower-cost goods in their consumption can have a masking effect on Consumer Price Index inflation, since a change to the consumption of lower-cost goods offsets the general rise in price level. As Saifedean Ammous writes in The Fiat Standard: “By subsidizing the production of the cheapest foods and recommending them to Americans as the optimal components of their diet, the extent of price increases and currency debasement is less obvious."
Read more at Mises Wire.
Cartagena is an undergraduate student attending Rutgers Business School studying finance.